National Accelerator
National Accelerator · 1 delivery partner
Live across the stream
Programme Evaluations
Oversee evaluations and stage gates across all delivery partners in this stream.
Evaluation stage gates
Seven stage-gate moments across the programme
Intake readiness review
Problem-solution fit review
Customer validation review
Business model review
MVP / product planning review
Funding readiness review
Final progression review
Delivery partner evaluation status
Comparing the 1 delivery partner in this stream
| Delivery partner | Completed | Pending | Overdue | Avg score | Progression | Evidence | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CzechInvest Technology Incubation | 17 | 4 | 0 | 62% | 3 | 59% | On track |
Venture evaluations
Every venture in the stream, with score, evidence and recommendation
| Startup | Founder | DP | Sector | Stage gate | Score | Evidence | Recommendation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Šumava Logic | Viktorie Novotná | CzechInvest Technology Incubation | AgriTech | MVP / product planning review | 39 | 35% | Re-route | |
| Orlík Robotics | Pavel Dvořák | CzechInvest Technology Incubation | FinTech | MVP / product planning review | 59 | 69% | Needs support | |
| Labe Labs | Filip Procházka | CzechInvest Technology Incubation | Marketplace | Final progression review | 87 | 56% | Specialist support | |
| Slovan Labs | Zuzana Pokorná | CzechInvest Technology Incubation | EdTech | Funding readiness review | 67 | 41% | Specialist support | |
| Říp Labs | Jakub Růžička | CzechInvest Technology Incubation | SaaS | MVP / product planning review | 64 | 71% | Needs support | |
| Kometa Bio | Jakub Kovář | CzechInvest Technology Incubation | Hardware | Funding readiness review | 82 | 71% | Pass | |
| Jantar Pay | Tomáš Fiala | CzechInvest Technology Incubation | HealthTech | MVP / product planning review | 49 | 48% | Rework | |
| Slovan OS | Petr Dvořák | CzechInvest Technology Incubation | EdTech | Funding readiness review | 83 | 61% | Seed candidate | |
| Nimbus Labs | Martin Veselý | CzechInvest Technology Incubation | SaaS | Final progression review | 35 | 67% | Re-route | |
| Kometa Energo | Viktorie Svobodová | CzechInvest Technology Incubation | CleanTech | MVP / product planning review | 57 | 68% | Needs support | |
| Tatra AI | Filip Dvořák | CzechInvest Technology Incubation | FinTech | Final progression review | 75 | 76% | Pass | |
| Křišťál Labs | Pavel Kratochvíl | CzechInvest Technology Incubation | Hardware | Funding readiness review | 80 | 64% | Seed candidate | |
| Avion Grid | Kateřina Nováková | CzechInvest Technology Incubation | Consumer | MVP / product planning review | 61 | 46% | Needs support | |
| Jantar OS | Zuzana Kovářová | CzechInvest Technology Incubation | HealthTech | Funding readiness review | 75 | 85% | Pass | |
| Stříbro Mobilita | Jan Novotný | CzechInvest Technology Incubation | CleanTech | Final progression review | 69 | 55% | Specialist support |
Evaluation criteria & scoring framework
Weighted criteria applied consistently across all delivery partners
Problem clarity
Clarity, specificity and urgency of the problem.
Customer validation
Evidence of customer demand and pain.
Market opportunity
Size, growth and accessibility of target market.
Solution fit
How well the solution addresses the problem.
Founder capability
Team strength, domain depth and resilience.
Business model strength
Revenue logic, unit economics, repeatability.
Product readiness
MVP maturity and shipping cadence.
Financial assumptions
Credibility of forecasts and funding plan.
Funding readiness
Investor materials, narrative, governance.
Impact potential
Economic, climate or societal contribution.
National Accelerator Evaluation Support
Across the National Accelerator stream, ventures are strongest on problem clarity and weakest on financial assumptions. Two delivery partners have the highest number of ventures requiring rework before funding-readiness review.
Evaluation report to Management Layer
Compile and send a stream evaluation summary to the National Layer
Bertie helps Stream Coordinators manage programme stage gates consistently across delivery partners, while using AI to summarise evidence, identify gaps and recommend the next best intervention for each venture.
