Bertie coordinator instance · simulated data
Specialist Accelerator·Sector-deep tracks across HealthTech, CleanTech, AI and Deep Tech.← EI Delivery Partner Performance
Stream coordinator console

Specialist

Specialist Accelerator · 6 delivery partners

0
Ventures
0
On track
0
At-risk

Live across the stream

Specialist · Coordinator

Programme Evaluations

Oversee evaluations and stage gates across all delivery partners in this stream.

Evaluations completed
112
Pending
28
Overdue
9
Avg stream score
68%
Recommended for Seed
14
Ventures needing support
11
AI summaries
47
DPs with evaluation gaps
2

Evaluation stage gates

Seven stage-gate moments across the programme

Gate 1

Intake readiness review

Assessed0Avg score0%Passed0Needs support0Not ready0Overdue0
Gate 2

Problem-solution fit review

Assessed0Avg score0%Passed0Needs support0Not ready0Overdue0
Gate 3

Customer validation review

Assessed22Avg score37%Passed0Needs support4Not ready18Overdue2
Gate 4

Business model review

Assessed10Avg score80%Passed9Needs support1Not ready0Overdue1
Gate 5

MVP / product planning review

Assessed12Avg score47%Passed0Needs support6Not ready6Overdue0
Gate 6

Funding readiness review

Assessed7Avg score82%Passed6Needs support1Not ready0Overdue0
Gate 7

Final progression review

Assessed0Avg score0%Passed0Needs support0Not ready0Overdue0

Delivery partner evaluation status

Comparing the 6 delivery partners in this stream

Delivery partnerCompletedPendingOverdueAvg scoreProgressionEvidenceStatus
ESA BIC Prague62161%047%On track
CERN Venture Connect80155%045%On track
Czech HealthTech Track (Brno)80150%246%Review
ENERN Climate Track71044%155%Review
Prague.AI Centre53054%251%Review
IT4Innovations Ostrava71058%154%On track

Venture evaluations

Every venture in the stream, with score, evidence and recommendation

StartupFounderDPSectorStage gateScoreEvidenceRecommendation
Křišťál WorksJan NovákESA BIC Prague
Hardware
Business model review8745%Specialist support
Jantar NanoFilip HorákESA BIC Prague
Hardware
MVP / product planning review6266%Needs support
Mendel DigitalLukáš PospíšilESA BIC Prague
Hardware
MVP / product planning review6150%Needs support
Sázava SenseAnna VeseláESA BIC Prague
Hardware
Business model review8263%Specialist support
Orlík NanoNatálie VeseláESA BIC Prague
Hardware
MVP / product planning review5336%Rework
Říp DigitalViktorie ČernáESA BIC Prague
Hardware
Business model review7141%Specialist support
Jantar LogicMatyáš KratochvílESA BIC Prague
Hardware
MVP / product planning review6156%Needs support
Sázava SoftwareVeronika KovářováESA BIC Prague
Hardware
Customer validation review1920%Re-route
Mendel LabsKateřina FialováCERN Venture Connect
Hardware
Customer validation review1714%Re-route
Praha LabsMatyáš FialaCERN Venture Connect
Hardware
Customer validation review5835%Needs support
Slovan AIBarbora FialováCERN Venture Connect
Hardware
Business model review8756%Specialist support
Nimbus SenseVeronika NovotnáCERN Venture Connect
Hardware
MVP / product planning review4144%Re-route
Morava GridTomáš SvobodaCERN Venture Connect
Hardware
Customer validation review4126%Re-route
Nimbus SystémyTomáš PospíšilCERN Venture Connect
Hardware
Customer validation review6370%Needs support
Ostrava HealthMatyáš RůžičkaCERN Venture Connect
Hardware
MVP / product planning review5961%Needs support
Showing 115 of 51 ventures
Page 1 of 4

Evaluation criteria & scoring framework

Weighted criteria applied consistently across all delivery partners

Problem clarity

10%

Clarity, specificity and urgency of the problem.

Stream avg score54%

Customer validation

15%

Evidence of customer demand and pain.

Stream avg score54%

Market opportunity

10%

Size, growth and accessibility of target market.

Stream avg score55%

Solution fit

10%

How well the solution addresses the problem.

Stream avg score53%

Founder capability

10%

Team strength, domain depth and resilience.

Stream avg score53%

Business model strength

10%

Revenue logic, unit economics, repeatability.

Stream avg score54%

Product readiness

10%

MVP maturity and shipping cadence.

Stream avg score54%

Financial assumptions

10%

Credibility of forecasts and funding plan.

Stream avg score53%

Funding readiness

10%

Investor materials, narrative, governance.

Stream avg score54%

Impact potential

5%

Economic, climate or societal contribution.

Stream avg score54%
Bertie AI Evaluation Support

Specialist Evaluation Support

Across the Specialist stream, ventures are strongest on problem clarity and weakest on financial assumptions. Two delivery partners have the highest number of ventures requiring rework before funding-readiness review.

Run shared finance clinicAssign business model mentorsRequest updated customer evidenceMove 6 ventures to progression panelFlag 3 ventures for specialist support

Evaluation report to Management Layer

Compile and send a stream evaluation summary to the National Layer

Bertie helps Stream Coordinators manage programme stage gates consistently across delivery partners, while using AI to summarise evidence, identify gaps and recommend the next best intervention for each venture.

Bertie